11 research outputs found

    Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil

    Get PDF
    © The Author(s), 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Domeignoz-Horta, L. A., Pold, G., Liu, X. A., Frey, S. D., Melillo, J. M., & DeAngelis, K. M. Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil. Nature Communications, 11(1), (2020): 3684, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17502-z.Empirical evidence for the response of soil carbon cycling to the combined effects of warming, drought and diversity loss is scarce. Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) plays a central role in regulating the flow of carbon through soil, yet how biotic and abiotic factors interact to drive it remains unclear. Here, we combine distinct community inocula (a biotic factor) with different temperature and moisture conditions (abiotic factors) to manipulate microbial diversity and community structure within a model soil. While community composition and diversity are the strongest predictors of CUE, abiotic factors modulated the relationship between diversity and CUE, with CUE being positively correlated with bacterial diversity only under high moisture. Altogether these results indicate that the diversity × ecosystem-function relationship can be impaired under non-favorable conditions in soils, and that to understand changes in soil C cycling we need to account for the multiple facets of global changes.Funding for this project was provided by the Department of Energy grant DE-SC0016590 to K.M.D. and S.D.F., and an American Association of University Women Dissertation fellowship to G.P. We would also like to thank Stuart Grandy and Kevin Geyer for the fruitful discussions and Mary Waters, Courtney Bly and Ana Horta for their help with samples processing

    Substrate availability and not thermal acclimation controls microbial temperature sensitivity response to long‐term warming

    Get PDF
    Microbes are responsible for cycling carbon (C) through soils, and predicted changes in soil C stocks under climate change are highly sensitive to shifts in the mechanisms assumed to control the microbial physiological response to warming. Two mechanisms have been suggested to explain the long-term warming impact on microbial physiology: microbial thermal acclimation and changes in the quantity and quality of substrates available for microbial metabolism. Yet studies disentangling these two mechanisms are lacking. To resolve the drivers of changes in microbial physiology in response to long-term warming, we sampled soils from 13- and 28-year-old soil warming experiments in different seasons. We performed short-term laboratory incubations across a range of temperatures to measure the relationships between temperature sensitivity of physiology (growth, respiration, carbon use efficiency, and extracellular enzyme activity) and the chemical composition of soil organic matter. We observed apparent thermal acclimation of microbial respiration, but only in summer, when warming had exacerbated the seasonally-induced, already small dissolved organic matter pools. Irrespective of warming, greater quantity and quality of soil carbon increased the extracellular enzymatic pool and its temperature sensitivity. We propose that fresh litter input into the system seasonally cancels apparent thermal acclimation of C-cycling processes to decadal warming. Our findings reveal that long-term warming has indirectly affected microbial physiology via reduced C availability in this system, implying that earth system models including these negative feedbacks may be best suited to describe long-term warming effects on these soils

    Ecology of N2O reducing bacteria in arable soils

    Get PDF
    Le protoxyde d’azote (N2O) est un gaz Ă  effet de serre (GES) important et la principale substance attaquant la couche d'ozone. Les sols agricoles sont la principale source anthropique de ce GES. La concentration de N2O dans l'atmosphĂšre est en constante augmentation, mais nous manquons de connaissances sur les facteurs contrĂŽlant sa production et sa consommation dans les sols. La rĂ©duction du N2O en N2 par des microorganismes porteurs du gĂšne codant pour la N2O rĂ©ductase (nosZ) est le seul processus biologique capable de rĂ©duire ce GES. Des Ă©tudes rĂ©centes ont mis en Ă©vidence un clade prĂ©cĂ©demment inconnu de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O qui interfĂšre de maniĂšre significative avec la quantitĂ© de N2O produite dans les sols. Cette thĂšse a cherchĂ© Ă  mieux comprendre l'Ă©cologie des rĂ©ducteurs du N2O dans les sols agricoles.Une combinaison d'expĂ©riences d'incubation en laboratoire mais aussi d’expĂ©riences en plein champs a Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©e pour essayer de mieux comprendre la production de N2O dans le sol, en analysant l’influence conjointe des producteurs et rĂ©ducteurs de N2O. Nous avons aussi Ă©valuĂ© l’impact des pratiques agricoles et leurs potentiels Ă  modifier ces communautĂ©s microbiennes. Suite aux essais rĂ©alisĂ©s en laboratoire, nous avons montrĂ© que l'ajout d'une souche non-dĂ©nitrifiante Dyadobacter fermentans,possĂ©dant la N2O rĂ©ductase NosZII, permettait de rĂ©duire la production de N2O dans 1/3 des sols testĂ©s. Certains sols sont mĂȘme devenus consommateurs de N2O suite Ă  l'ajout de la souche nosZII. Cette expĂ©rience a dĂ©montrĂ© la contribution des bactĂ©ries nosZII non-dĂ©nitrifiantes dans la consommation de N2O dans le sol.D’autre part, nos analyses en contexte agricole ont montrĂ© que les pratiques agricoles testĂ©es ont peu d’influence sur les communautĂ©s microbiennes considĂ©rĂ©es, les exceptions Ă©tant le travail du sol (labour), et le systĂšme de culture (annuel ou pĂ©renne). L’intensifiant du travail du sol induit une augmentation de la diversitĂ© de nosZII. Nous observons le mĂȘme phĂ©nomĂšne dans le systĂšme de culture annuel comparĂ© au systĂšme de culture pĂ©renne. D’autres rĂ©sultats nous permettent aussi d’affirmer que le clade rĂ©cemment identifiĂ© de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O est plus sensible aux variables environnementales que le clade prĂ©cĂ©demment connu (nosZI). Les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol, notamment pH et C:N structurent les communautĂ©s microbiennes appartenant Ă  ces 2 clades indiquant une spĂ©cialisation de niche pour chacun de ces deux clades de N2O-rĂ©ducteurs.Pour mieux comprendre les relations entre les communautĂ©s microbiennes et les processus impliquĂ©s, nous avons Ă©valuĂ© les activitĂ©s potentielles de dĂ©nitrification et de nitrification, et les Ă©missions de N2O in situ. La production potentielle de N2O et l'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es pour calculer le ratio de production de N2O (N2O:N2). La diversitĂ© du clade nosZII est nĂ©gativement corrĂ©lĂ©e au ratio N2O:N2, et explique Ă  elle seule la plus grande part de variance observĂ©e du ratio N2O:N2. Les variations de production potentielle de N2O et d'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification sont elles expliquĂ©es principalement par les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol. Afin de mieux Ă©valuer la contribution des diffĂ©rents facteurs Ă©daphiques et microbiologiques aux variations d’émission in situ de N2O, 70000 mesures ont Ă©tĂ© subdivisĂ©es en diffĂ©rentes gammes d’émission de N2O, dâ€˜Ă©missions dites de base Ă  des Ă©missions Ă©levĂ©es. Fait intĂ©ressant, les variations d’émissions in situ de N2O dites de base sont seulement liĂ©es Ă  des variations du pH du sol, alors que les variations d’émissions dites Ă©levĂ©es sont Ă©galement fortement associĂ©es aux variations de diversitĂ© des communautĂ©s microbiennes. Parmi les variables microbiennes importantes, nous avons constatĂ© que la diversitĂ© des nosZII est nĂ©gativement liĂ©e aux Ă©missions de N2O in situ dites Ă©levĂ©es.En conclusion, nos rĂ©sultats mettent en Ă©vidence l’importance du clade nosZII pour le cycle du N2O dans le sol (...).Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an important greenhouse gas (GHG) and the main ozone depleting substance. Agricultural soils are the main anthropogenic-induced source of this GHG. The concentration of N2O in the atmosphere is steadily increasing, but we still lack knowledge on the factors controlling its production and consumption in soils. The reduction of N2O to N2 by microorganisms harboring the N2O reductase gene (nosZ) is the only known biological process able to consume this GHG. Recent studies revealed a previously unknown clade of N2O-reducers which was shown to be important to the N2O sink capacity of soils. This thesis seeks to gain a greater understanding on the ecology of N2O-reducers in agricultural soils. A combination of laboratory incubation and field experiments were used to gain knowledge on the importance of N2O-producers and N2O-reducers to the soil N2O production. Additionally, the potential of agricultural practices to modify those microbial communities were assessed.We showed experimentally, in laboratory incubations, that the addition of a non-denitrifying strain Dyadobacter fermentans, which possesses the previously unaccounted N2O reductase NosZII, reduced N2O production in 1/3 of the tested soils. Remarkably, after addition of the nosZII strain, some soils became a N2O sink, as negative rates were recorded. This experiment provided unambiguous evidence that the overlooked non-denitrifying nosZII bacteria can contribute to N2O consumption in soil.Our evaluation of agricultural field experiments showed limited impact of agricultural practices on the microbial communities except for tillage management, and differences observed between an annual and a perennial cropping system. Increasing tillage management enhanced nosZII diversity. Higher diversity of the nosZII clade was also observed in the annual cropping system than in the perennial cropping system. Overall, the recently identified clade of N2O-reducers was more sensitive to environmental variables than the previously known clade (nosZI). The community structure of these two groups was explained by common and uncommon soil properties suggesting niche specialization between the two N2O-reducers.In an attempt to understand the relationship between the microbial communities and process rates, we assessed the potential denitrification and nitrification rates, and in situ N2O emissions. Potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were used to calculate the denitrification end-product ratio. The diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the N2O:N2 ratio and explained the highest fraction of its variation (26%), while the potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were mainly explained by the soil properties. To better evaluate the contribution of different factors to the in situ emissions, more than 70000 N2O measurements were subdivided into different ranges, from low to high rates. Interestingly, the low range of in situ N2O emissions was only related to soil pH, while the high ranges were also strongly related to the microbial communities. This result suggests that the “base-line” N2O emissions might be more regulated by soil edaphic conditions than by microorganisms, the lasts being more important for the high emissions ranges. Among the significant microbial variables, we found that the diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the high ranges of in situ N2O emissions.In conclusion, our results highlight the relevance of the second clade of N2O-reducers to the fate of N2O in soil. Our results also suggest niche differentiation between the two N2O-reducing clades with nosZII being more responsive to environmental variables. Agricultural practices showed limited impact on the two guilds. Further research is needed to test the niche specialization between the two groups, to disentangle their controlling factors, and to evaluate their potential for N2O mitigation

    Ecology of N2O reducing bacteria in arable soils

    No full text
    Le protoxyde d’azote (N2O) est un gaz Ă  effet de serre (GES) important et la principale substance attaquant la couche d'ozone. Les sols agricoles sont la principale source anthropique de ce GES. La concentration de N2O dans l'atmosphĂšre est en constante augmentation, mais nous manquons de connaissances sur les facteurs contrĂŽlant sa production et sa consommation dans les sols. La rĂ©duction du N2O en N2 par des microorganismes porteurs du gĂšne codant pour la N2O rĂ©ductase (nosZ) est le seul processus biologique capable de rĂ©duire ce GES. Des Ă©tudes rĂ©centes ont mis en Ă©vidence un clade prĂ©cĂ©demment inconnu de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O qui interfĂšre de maniĂšre significative avec la quantitĂ© de N2O produite dans les sols. Cette thĂšse a cherchĂ© Ă  mieux comprendre l'Ă©cologie des rĂ©ducteurs du N2O dans les sols agricoles.Une combinaison d'expĂ©riences d'incubation en laboratoire mais aussi d’expĂ©riences en plein champs a Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©e pour essayer de mieux comprendre la production de N2O dans le sol, en analysant l’influence conjointe des producteurs et rĂ©ducteurs de N2O. Nous avons aussi Ă©valuĂ© l’impact des pratiques agricoles et leurs potentiels Ă  modifier ces communautĂ©s microbiennes. Suite aux essais rĂ©alisĂ©s en laboratoire, nous avons montrĂ© que l'ajout d'une souche non-dĂ©nitrifiante Dyadobacter fermentans,possĂ©dant la N2O rĂ©ductase NosZII, permettait de rĂ©duire la production de N2O dans 1/3 des sols testĂ©s. Certains sols sont mĂȘme devenus consommateurs de N2O suite Ă  l'ajout de la souche nosZII. Cette expĂ©rience a dĂ©montrĂ© la contribution des bactĂ©ries nosZII non-dĂ©nitrifiantes dans la consommation de N2O dans le sol.D’autre part, nos analyses en contexte agricole ont montrĂ© que les pratiques agricoles testĂ©es ont peu d’influence sur les communautĂ©s microbiennes considĂ©rĂ©es, les exceptions Ă©tant le travail du sol (labour), et le systĂšme de culture (annuel ou pĂ©renne). L’intensifiant du travail du sol induit une augmentation de la diversitĂ© de nosZII. Nous observons le mĂȘme phĂ©nomĂšne dans le systĂšme de culture annuel comparĂ© au systĂšme de culture pĂ©renne. D’autres rĂ©sultats nous permettent aussi d’affirmer que le clade rĂ©cemment identifiĂ© de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O est plus sensible aux variables environnementales que le clade prĂ©cĂ©demment connu (nosZI). Les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol, notamment pH et C:N structurent les communautĂ©s microbiennes appartenant Ă  ces 2 clades indiquant une spĂ©cialisation de niche pour chacun de ces deux clades de N2O-rĂ©ducteurs.Pour mieux comprendre les relations entre les communautĂ©s microbiennes et les processus impliquĂ©s, nous avons Ă©valuĂ© les activitĂ©s potentielles de dĂ©nitrification et de nitrification, et les Ă©missions de N2O in situ. La production potentielle de N2O et l'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es pour calculer le ratio de production de N2O (N2O:N2). La diversitĂ© du clade nosZII est nĂ©gativement corrĂ©lĂ©e au ratio N2O:N2, et explique Ă  elle seule la plus grande part de variance observĂ©e du ratio N2O:N2. Les variations de production potentielle de N2O et d'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification sont elles expliquĂ©es principalement par les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol. Afin de mieux Ă©valuer la contribution des diffĂ©rents facteurs Ă©daphiques et microbiologiques aux variations d’émission in situ de N2O, 70000 mesures ont Ă©tĂ© subdivisĂ©es en diffĂ©rentes gammes d’émission de N2O, dâ€˜Ă©missions dites de base Ă  des Ă©missions Ă©levĂ©es. Fait intĂ©ressant, les variations d’émissions in situ de N2O dites de base sont seulement liĂ©es Ă  des variations du pH du sol, alors que les variations d’émissions dites Ă©levĂ©es sont Ă©galement fortement associĂ©es aux variations de diversitĂ© des communautĂ©s microbiennes. Parmi les variables microbiennes importantes, nous avons constatĂ© que la diversitĂ© des nosZII est nĂ©gativement liĂ©e aux Ă©missions de N2O in situ dites Ă©levĂ©es.En conclusion, nos rĂ©sultats mettent en Ă©vidence l’importance du clade nosZII pour le cycle du N2O dans le sol (...).Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an important greenhouse gas (GHG) and the main ozone depleting substance. Agricultural soils are the main anthropogenic-induced source of this GHG. The concentration of N2O in the atmosphere is steadily increasing, but we still lack knowledge on the factors controlling its production and consumption in soils. The reduction of N2O to N2 by microorganisms harboring the N2O reductase gene (nosZ) is the only known biological process able to consume this GHG. Recent studies revealed a previously unknown clade of N2O-reducers which was shown to be important to the N2O sink capacity of soils. This thesis seeks to gain a greater understanding on the ecology of N2O-reducers in agricultural soils. A combination of laboratory incubation and field experiments were used to gain knowledge on the importance of N2O-producers and N2O-reducers to the soil N2O production. Additionally, the potential of agricultural practices to modify those microbial communities were assessed.We showed experimentally, in laboratory incubations, that the addition of a non-denitrifying strain Dyadobacter fermentans, which possesses the previously unaccounted N2O reductase NosZII, reduced N2O production in 1/3 of the tested soils. Remarkably, after addition of the nosZII strain, some soils became a N2O sink, as negative rates were recorded. This experiment provided unambiguous evidence that the overlooked non-denitrifying nosZII bacteria can contribute to N2O consumption in soil.Our evaluation of agricultural field experiments showed limited impact of agricultural practices on the microbial communities except for tillage management, and differences observed between an annual and a perennial cropping system. Increasing tillage management enhanced nosZII diversity. Higher diversity of the nosZII clade was also observed in the annual cropping system than in the perennial cropping system. Overall, the recently identified clade of N2O-reducers was more sensitive to environmental variables than the previously known clade (nosZI). The community structure of these two groups was explained by common and uncommon soil properties suggesting niche specialization between the two N2O-reducers.In an attempt to understand the relationship between the microbial communities and process rates, we assessed the potential denitrification and nitrification rates, and in situ N2O emissions. Potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were used to calculate the denitrification end-product ratio. The diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the N2O:N2 ratio and explained the highest fraction of its variation (26%), while the potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were mainly explained by the soil properties. To better evaluate the contribution of different factors to the in situ emissions, more than 70000 N2O measurements were subdivided into different ranges, from low to high rates. Interestingly, the low range of in situ N2O emissions was only related to soil pH, while the high ranges were also strongly related to the microbial communities. This result suggests that the “base-line” N2O emissions might be more regulated by soil edaphic conditions than by microorganisms, the lasts being more important for the high emissions ranges. Among the significant microbial variables, we found that the diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the high ranges of in situ N2O emissions.In conclusion, our results highlight the relevance of the second clade of N2O-reducers to the fate of N2O in soil. Our results also suggest niche differentiation between the two N2O-reducing clades with nosZII being more responsive to environmental variables. Agricultural practices showed limited impact on the two guilds. Further research is needed to test the niche specialization between the two groups, to disentangle their controlling factors, and to evaluate their potential for N2O mitigation

    Ecologie des bactéries N2O réductrices dans les sols agricoles

    No full text
    Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an important greenhouse gas (GHG) and the main ozone depleting substance. Agricultural soils are the main anthropogenic-induced source of this GHG. The concentration of N2O in the atmosphere is steadily increasing, but we still lack knowledge on the factors controlling its production and consumption in soils. The reduction of N2O to N2 by microorganisms harboring the N2O reductase gene (nosZ) is the only known biological process able to consume this GHG. Recent studies revealed a previously unknown clade of N2O-reducers which was shown to be important to the N2O sink capacity of soils. This thesis seeks to gain a greater understanding on the ecology of N2O-reducers in agricultural soils. A combination of laboratory incubation and field experiments were used to gain knowledge on the importance of N2O-producers and N2O-reducers to the soil N2O production. Additionally, the potential of agricultural practices to modify those microbial communities were assessed.We showed experimentally, in laboratory incubations, that the addition of a non-denitrifying strain Dyadobacter fermentans, which possesses the previously unaccounted N2O reductase NosZII, reduced N2O production in 1/3 of the tested soils. Remarkably, after addition of the nosZII strain, some soils became a N2O sink, as negative rates were recorded. This experiment provided unambiguous evidence that the overlooked non-denitrifying nosZII bacteria can contribute to N2O consumption in soil.Our evaluation of agricultural field experiments showed limited impact of agricultural practices on the microbial communities except for tillage management, and differences observed between an annual and a perennial cropping system. Increasing tillage management enhanced nosZII diversity. Higher diversity of the nosZII clade was also observed in the annual cropping system than in the perennial cropping system. Overall, the recently identified clade of N2O-reducers was more sensitive to environmental variables than the previously known clade (nosZI). The community structure of these two groups was explained by common and uncommon soil properties suggesting niche specialization between the two N2O-reducers.In an attempt to understand the relationship between the microbial communities and process rates, we assessed the potential denitrification and nitrification rates, and in situ N2O emissions. Potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were used to calculate the denitrification end-product ratio. The diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the N2O:N2 ratio and explained the highest fraction of its variation (26%), while the potential N2O production and potential denitrification activity were mainly explained by the soil properties. To better evaluate the contribution of different factors to the in situ emissions, more than 70000 N2O measurements were subdivided into different ranges, from low to high rates. Interestingly, the low range of in situ N2O emissions was only related to soil pH, while the high ranges were also strongly related to the microbial communities. This result suggests that the “base-line” N2O emissions might be more regulated by soil edaphic conditions than by microorganisms, the lasts being more important for the high emissions ranges. Among the significant microbial variables, we found that the diversity of nosZII was negatively related to the high ranges of in situ N2O emissions.In conclusion, our results highlight the relevance of the second clade of N2O-reducers to the fate of N2O in soil. Our results also suggest niche differentiation between the two N2O-reducing clades with nosZII being more responsive to environmental variables. Agricultural practices showed limited impact on the two guilds. Further research is needed to test the niche specialization between the two groups, to disentangle their controlling factors, and to evaluate their potential for N2O mitigation.Le protoxyde d’azote (N2O) est un gaz Ă  effet de serre (GES) important et la principale substance attaquant la couche d'ozone. Les sols agricoles sont la principale source anthropique de ce GES. La concentration de N2O dans l'atmosphĂšre est en constante augmentation, mais nous manquons de connaissances sur les facteurs contrĂŽlant sa production et sa consommation dans les sols. La rĂ©duction du N2O en N2 par des microorganismes porteurs du gĂšne codant pour la N2O rĂ©ductase (nosZ) est le seul processus biologique capable de rĂ©duire ce GES. Des Ă©tudes rĂ©centes ont mis en Ă©vidence un clade prĂ©cĂ©demment inconnu de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O qui interfĂšre de maniĂšre significative avec la quantitĂ© de N2O produite dans les sols. Cette thĂšse a cherchĂ© Ă  mieux comprendre l'Ă©cologie des rĂ©ducteurs du N2O dans les sols agricoles.Une combinaison d'expĂ©riences d'incubation en laboratoire mais aussi d’expĂ©riences en plein champs a Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©e pour essayer de mieux comprendre la production de N2O dans le sol, en analysant l’influence conjointe des producteurs et rĂ©ducteurs de N2O. Nous avons aussi Ă©valuĂ© l’impact des pratiques agricoles et leurs potentiels Ă  modifier ces communautĂ©s microbiennes. Suite aux essais rĂ©alisĂ©s en laboratoire, nous avons montrĂ© que l'ajout d'une souche non-dĂ©nitrifiante Dyadobacter fermentans,possĂ©dant la N2O rĂ©ductase NosZII, permettait de rĂ©duire la production de N2O dans 1/3 des sols testĂ©s. Certains sols sont mĂȘme devenus consommateurs de N2O suite Ă  l'ajout de la souche nosZII. Cette expĂ©rience a dĂ©montrĂ© la contribution des bactĂ©ries nosZII non-dĂ©nitrifiantes dans la consommation de N2O dans le sol.D’autre part, nos analyses en contexte agricole ont montrĂ© que les pratiques agricoles testĂ©es ont peu d’influence sur les communautĂ©s microbiennes considĂ©rĂ©es, les exceptions Ă©tant le travail du sol (labour), et le systĂšme de culture (annuel ou pĂ©renne). L’intensifiant du travail du sol induit une augmentation de la diversitĂ© de nosZII. Nous observons le mĂȘme phĂ©nomĂšne dans le systĂšme de culture annuel comparĂ© au systĂšme de culture pĂ©renne. D’autres rĂ©sultats nous permettent aussi d’affirmer que le clade rĂ©cemment identifiĂ© de rĂ©ducteurs du N2O est plus sensible aux variables environnementales que le clade prĂ©cĂ©demment connu (nosZI). Les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol, notamment pH et C:N structurent les communautĂ©s microbiennes appartenant Ă  ces 2 clades indiquant une spĂ©cialisation de niche pour chacun de ces deux clades de N2O-rĂ©ducteurs.Pour mieux comprendre les relations entre les communautĂ©s microbiennes et les processus impliquĂ©s, nous avons Ă©valuĂ© les activitĂ©s potentielles de dĂ©nitrification et de nitrification, et les Ă©missions de N2O in situ. La production potentielle de N2O et l'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es pour calculer le ratio de production de N2O (N2O:N2). La diversitĂ© du clade nosZII est nĂ©gativement corrĂ©lĂ©e au ratio N2O:N2, et explique Ă  elle seule la plus grande part de variance observĂ©e du ratio N2O:N2. Les variations de production potentielle de N2O et d'activitĂ© potentielle de dĂ©nitrification sont elles expliquĂ©es principalement par les variations de propriĂ©tĂ©s du sol. Afin de mieux Ă©valuer la contribution des diffĂ©rents facteurs Ă©daphiques et microbiologiques aux variations d’émission in situ de N2O, 70000 mesures ont Ă©tĂ© subdivisĂ©es en diffĂ©rentes gammes d’émission de N2O, dâ€˜Ă©missions dites de base Ă  des Ă©missions Ă©levĂ©es. Fait intĂ©ressant, les variations d’émissions in situ de N2O dites de base sont seulement liĂ©es Ă  des variations du pH du sol, alors que les variations d’émissions dites Ă©levĂ©es sont Ă©galement fortement associĂ©es aux variations de diversitĂ© des communautĂ©s microbiennes. Parmi les variables microbiennes importantes, nous avons constatĂ© que la diversitĂ© des nosZII est nĂ©gativement liĂ©e aux Ă©missions de N2O in situ dites Ă©levĂ©es.En conclusion, nos rĂ©sultats mettent en Ă©vidence l’importance du clade nosZII pour le cycle du N2O dans le sol (...)

    Plant biodiversity promotes sustainable agriculture directly and via belowground effects

    Full text link
    While the positive relationship between plant biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) is well established, the extent to which this is mediated via belowground microbial processes is poorly understood. Growing evidence suggests that plant community structure influences soil microbial diversity, which in turn promotes functions desired for sustainable agriculture. Here, we outline the ‘plant-directed’ and soil microbe-mediated mechanisms expected to promote positive BEF. We identify how this knowledge can be utilized in plant diversification schemes to maximize ecosystem functioning in agroecosystems, which are typically species poor and sensitive to biotic and abiotic stressors. In the face of resource overexploitation and global change, bridging the gaps between biodiversity science and agricultural practices is crucial to meet food security in the Anthropocene

    Carbon Use Efficiency and Its Temperature Sensitivity Covary in Soil Bacteria

    No full text
    Soil microbes respond to environmental change by altering how they allocate carbon to growth versus respiration—or carbon use efficiency (CUE). Ecosystem and Earth System models, used to project how global soil C stocks will continue to respond to the climate crisis, often assume that microbes respond homogeneously to changes in the environment. In this study, we quantified how CUE varies with changes in temperature and substrate quality in soil bacteria and evaluated why CUE characteristics may differ between bacterial isolates and in response to altered growth conditions. We found that bacterial taxa capable of rapid growth were more efficient than those limited to slow growth and that taxa with high CUE were more likely to become less efficient at higher temperatures than those that were less efficient to begin with. Together, our results support the idea that the CUE temperature response is constrained by both growth rate and CUE and that this partly explains how bacteria acclimate to a warming world.The strategy that microbial decomposers take with respect to using substrate for growth versus maintenance is one essential biological determinant of the propensity of carbon to remain in soil. To quantify the environmental sensitivity of this key physiological trade-off, we characterized the carbon use efficiency (CUE) of 23 soil bacterial isolates across seven phyla at three temperatures and with up to four substrates. Temperature altered CUE in both an isolate-specific manner and a substrate-specific manner. We searched for genes correlated with the temperature sensitivity of CUE on glucose and deemed those functional genes which were similarly correlated with CUE on other substrates to be validated as markers of CUE. Ultimately, we did not identify any such robust functional gene markers of CUE or its temperature sensitivity. However, we found a positive correlation between rRNA operon copy number and CUE, opposite what was expected. We also found that inefficient taxa increased their CUE with temperature, while those with high CUE showed a decrease in CUE with temperature. Together, our results indicate that CUE is a flexible parameter within bacterial taxa and that the temperature sensitivity of CUE is better explained by observed physiology than by genomic composition across diverse taxa. We conclude that the bacterial CUE response to temperature and substrate is more variable than previously thought

    Substrate availability and not thermal-acclimation controls microbial temperature sensitivity response to long term warming

    Full text link
    Microbes are responsible for cycling carbon (C) through soils, and predicted changes in soil C stocks under climate change are highly sensitive to shifts in the mechanisms assumed to control the microbial physiological response to warming. Two mechanisms have been suggested to explain the long-term warming impact on microbial physiology: microbial thermal-acclimation and changes in the quantity and quality of substrates available for microbial metabolism. Yet studies disentangling these two mechanisms are lacking. To resolve the drivers of changes in microbial physiology in response to long-term warming, we sampled soils from 13- and 28-year old soil warming experiments in different seasons. We performed short-term laboratory incubations across a range of temperatures to measure the relationships between temperature sensitivity of physiology (growth, respiration, carbon use efficiency and extracellular enzyme activity) and the chemical composition of soil organic matter. We observed apparent thermal acclimation of microbial respiration, but only in summer, when warming had exacerbated the seasonally-induced, already small dissolved organic matter pools. Irrespective of warming, greater quantity and quality of soil carbon increased the extracellular enzymatic pool and its temperature sensitivity. We propose that fresh litter input into the system seasonally cancels apparent thermal acclimation of C-cycling processes to decadal warming. Our findings reveal that long-term warming has indirectly affected microbial physiology via reduced C availability in this system, implying that earth system models including these negative feedbacks may be best suited to describe long-term warming impact in these soils

    Maintaining grass coverage increases methane uptake in Amazonian pastures, with a reduction of methanogenic archaea in the rhizosphere

    Full text link
    Cattle ranching is the largest driver of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. The rainforest-to-pasture conversion affects the methane cycle in upland soils, changing it from sink to source of atmospheric methane. However, it remains unknown if management practices could reduce the impact of land-use on methane cycling. In this work, we evaluated how pasture management can regulate the soil methane cycle either by maintaining continuous grass coverage on pasture soils, or by liming the soil to amend acidity. Methane fluxes from forest and pasture soils were evaluated in moisture-controlled greenhouse experiments with and without grass cover (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu) or liming. We also assessed changes in the soil microbial community structure of both bare (bulk) and rhizospheric pasture soils through high throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, and quantified the methane cycling microbiota by their respective marker genes related to methane generation (mcrA) or oxidation (pmoA). The experiments used soils from eastern and western Amazonia, and concurrent field studies allowed us to confirm greenhouse data. The presence of a grass cover not only increased methane uptake by up to 35% in pasture soils, but also reduced the abundance of the methane-producing community. In the grass rhizosphere this reduction was up to 10-fold. Methane-producing archaea belonged to the genera Methanosarcina sp., Methanocella sp., Methanobacterium sp., and Rice Cluster I. Further, we showed that soil liming to increasing pH compromised the capacity of forest and pasture soils to be a sink for methane, and instead converted formerly methane-consuming forest soils to become methane sources in only 40-80 days. Liming reduced the relative abundance of Beijerinckiacea family in forest soils, which account for many known methanotrophs. Our results demonstrate that pasture management that maintains grass coverage can mitigate soil methane emissions, compared to bare (bulk) pasture soil
    corecore